BMTBiomaterials TranslationalTBA2096-112XBiomaterials Translational10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.03.006Research ArticleCellular responses to nanoscale substrate topography of TiO2 nanotube arrays: cell morphology and adhesionhttps://artdesignp.com/journal/BMT/3/3/10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.03.006KingsakMonchupa,MaturavongsaditPanita,JiangHong,WangQian2022332022-09-28Nanotopographical features can be beneficial in augmenting cell functions and increasing osteogenic potential. However, the relationships between surface topographies and biological responses are difficult to establish due to the difficulty in controlling the surface topographical features at a low–nanometre scale. Herein, we report the fabrication of well–defined controllable titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanotube arrays with a wide range of pore sizes, 30–175 nm in diameter, and use of the electrochemical anodization method to assess the effect of surface nanotopographies on cell morphology and adhesion. The results show that TiO2 nanotube arrays with pore sizes of 30 and 80 nm allowed for cell spreading of bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells with increased cell area coverage. Additionally, cell adhesion was significantly enhanced by controlled nanotopographies of TiO2 nanotube arrays with 80 nm pore size. Our results demonstrate that surface modification at the nano–scale level with size tunability under controlled chemical/physical properties and culture conditions can greatly impact cell responses. These findings point to a new direction of material design for bone–tissue engineering in orthopaedic applications.cell adhesion, cellular responses, morphology, nanotopography, TiO2 nanotube arrays

1. Gibon, E.; Amanatullah, D. F.; Loi, F.; Pajarinen, J.; Nabeshima, A.; Yao, Z.; Hamadouche, M.; Goodman, S. B. The biological response to orthopaedic implants for joint replacement: Part I: Metals. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017, 105, 2162-2173. 2. Cherubino, P.; Ratti, C.; Fagetti, A.; Binda, T. Total hip arthroplasty and bone fragility. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011, 23, 76-77. 3. Etkin, C. D.; Springer, B. D. The American Joint Replacement Registry—the first 5 years. Arthroplast Today. 2017, 3, 67-69. 4. Saini, M.; Singh, Y.; Arora, P.; Arora, V.; Jain, K. Implant biomaterials: a comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases. 2015, 3, 52-57. 5. Guo, X.; Wang, Q. Magnesium-based biodegradable metal materials: past, present and future. Biomater Transl. 2021, 2, 175-176. 6. Jing, X.; Ding, Q.; Wu, Q.; Su, W.; Yu, K.; Su, Y.; Ye, B.; Gao, Q.; Sun, T.; Guo, X. Magnesium-based materials in orthopaedics: material properties and animal models. Biomater Transl. 2021, 2, 197-213. 7. Eliaz, N. Corrosion of metallic biomaterials: a review. Materials (Basel). 2019, 12, 407. 8. Shokeen, B.; Zamani, L.; Zadmehr, S.; Pouraghaie, S.; Ozawa, R.; Yilmaz, B.; Lilak, S.; Sharma, S.; Ogawa, T.; Moshaverinia, A.; Lux, R. Surface characterization and assessment of biofilm formation on two titanium-based implant coating materials. Front Dent Med. 2021, 2, 695417. 9. Arciola, C. R.; Campoccia, D.; Montanaro, L. Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018, 16, 397-409. 10. Kim, K. T.; Eo, M. Y.; Nguyen, T. T. H.; Kim, S. M. General review of titanium toxicity. Int J Implant Dent. 2019, 5, 10. 11. Gittens, R. A.; Olivares-Navarrete, R.; Schwartz, Z.; Boyan, B. D. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 3363-3371. 12. Schwarz, F.; Wieland, M.; Schwartz, Z.; Zhao, G.; Rupp, F.; Geis-Gerstorfer, J.; Schedle, A.; Broggini, N.; Bornstein, M. M.; Buser, D.; Ferguson, S. J.; Becker, J.; Boyan, B. D.; Cochran, D. L. Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009, 88, 544-557. 13. Kam, K. R.; Walsh, L. A.; Bock, S. M.; Ollerenshaw, J. D.; Ross, R. F.; Desai, T. A. The effect of nanotopography on modulating protein adsorption and the fibrotic response. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014, 20, 130-138. 14. Kaur, G.; Valarmathi, M. T.; Potts, J. D.; Jabbari, E.; Sabo-Attwood, T.; Wang, Q. Regulation of osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells on 2D nanorod substrates. Biomaterials. 2010, 31, 1732-1741. 15. Kaur, G.; Valarmathi, M. T.; Potts, J. D.; Wang, Q. The promotion of osteoblastic differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells by a polyvalent plant mosaic virus. Biomaterials. 2008, 29, 4074-4081. 16. Kaur, G.; Wang, C.; Sun, J.; Wang, Q. The synergistic effects of multivalent ligand display and nanotopography on osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stem cells. Biomaterials. 2010, 31, 5813-5824. 17. Lin, Y.; Su, Z.; Niu, Z.; Li, S.; Kaur, G.; Lee, L. A.; Wang, Q. Layer-by-layer assembly of viral capsid for cell adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4, 838-843. 18. Sitasuwan, P.; Lee, L. A.; Li, K.; Nguyen, H. G.; Wang, Q. RGD-conjugated rod-like viral nanoparticles on 2D scaffold improve bone differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Front Chem. 2014, 2, 31. 19. Metavarayuth, K.; Maturavongsadit, P.; Chen, X.; Sitasuwan, P.; Lu, L.; Su, J.; Wang, Q. Nanotopographical cues mediate osteogenesis of stem cells on virus substrates through BMP-2 intermediate. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 8372-8380. 20. Metavarayuth, K.; Villarreal, E.; Wang, H.; Wang, Q. Surface topography and free energy regulate osteogenesis of stem cells: effects of shape-controlled gold nanoparticles. Biomater Transl. 2021, 2, 165-173. 21. Robin, A.; Bernardes de Almeida Ribeiro, M.; Luiz Rosa, J.; Zenhei Nakazato, R.; Borges Silva, M. Formation of TiO2 nanotube layer by anodization of titanium in ethylene Glycol-H2O electrolyte. J Surf Eng Mater Adv Technol. 2014, 4, 123-130. 22. Brammer, K. S.; Frandsen, C. J.; Jin, S. TiO2 nanotubes for bone regeneration. Trends Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 315-322. 23. Kulkarni, M.; Mazare, A.; Gongadze, E.; Perutkova, Š.; Kralj-Iglič, V.; Milošev, I.; Schmuki, P.; Iglič, A.; Mozetič, M. Titanium nanostructures for biomedical applications. Nanotechnology. 2015, 26, 062002. 24. Strnad, G.; Petrovan, C.; Russu, O.; Jakab-Farkas, L. TiO2 nanostructured surfaces for biomedical applications developed by electrochemical anodization. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2016, 161, 012051. 25. Dalby, M. J.; Gadegaard, N.; Oreffo, R. O. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nat Mater. 2014, 13, 558-569. 26. Wang, N.; Butler, J. P.; Ingber, D. E. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 1993, 260, 1124-1127. 27. Ravichandran, R.; Liao, S.; Ng, C.; Chan, C. K.; Raghunath, M.; Ramakrishna, S. Effects of nanotopography on stem cell phenotypes. World J Stem Cells. 2009, 1, 55-66. 28. Oh, S.; Brammer, K. S.; Li, Y. S.; Teng, D.; Engler, A. J.; Chien, S.; Jin, S. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106, 2130-2135. 29. Park, J. H.; Gu, L.; von Maltzahn, G.; Ruoslahti, E.; Bhatia, S. N.; Sailor, M. J. Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications. Nat Mater. 2009, 8, 331-336. 30. Park, J.; Bauer, S.; Schmuki, P.; von der Mark, K. Narrow window in nanoscale dependent activation of endothelial cell growth and differentiation on TiO2 nanotube surfaces. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3157-3164. 31. Yu, W. Q.; Jiang, X. Q.; Zhang, F. Q.; Xu, L. The effect of anatase TiO2 nanotube layers on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010, 94, 1012-1022. 32. Zhao, L.; Liu, L.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chu, P. K. Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials. 2012, 33, 2629-2641. 33. Lai, M.; Cai, K.; Zhao, L.; Chen, X.; Hou, Y.; Yang, Z. Surface functionalization of TiO2 nanotubes with bone morphogenetic protein 2 and its synergistic effect on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules. 2011, 12, 1097-1105. 34. Smith, B. S.; Yoriya, S.; Johnson, T.; Popat, K. C. Dermal fibroblast and epidermal keratinocyte functionality on titania nanotube arrays. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 2686-2696. 35. Zhang, Y.; Luo, R.; Tan, J.; Wang, J.; Lu, X.; Qu, S.; Weng, J.; Feng, B. Osteoblast behaviors on titania nanotube and mesopore layers. Regen Biomater. 2017, 4, 81-87. 36. Park, J.; Bauer, S.; von der Mark, K.; Schmuki, P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1686-1691. 37. Boussu, K.; Van der Bruggen, B.; Volodin, A.; Snauwaert, J.; Van Haesendonck, C.; Vandecasteele, C. Roughness and hydrophobicity studies of nanofiltration membranes using different modes of AFM. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 286, 632-638. 38. Lee, L. A.; Nguyen, Q. L.; Wu, L.; Horvath, G.; Nelson, R. S.; Wang, Q. Mutant plant viruses with cell binding motifs provide differential adhesion strengths and morphologies. Biomacromolecules. 2012, 13, 422-431. 39. Nadri, S.; Soleimani, M. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells from murine bone marrow and amniotic fluid. Cytotherapy. 2007, 9, 729-737. 40. Ito, H.; Uchida, T.; Makita, K. Interactions between rat alveolar epithelial cells and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: an in vitro co-culture model. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2015, 3, 53. 41. Schneider, C. A.; Rasband, W. S.; Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012, 9, 671-675. 42. Doube, M.; Kłosowski, M. M.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Cordelières, F. P.; Dougherty, R. P.; Jackson, J. S.; Schmid, B.; Hutchinson, J. R.; Shefelbine, S. J. BoneJ: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone. 2010, 47, 1076-1079. 43. Guan, D.; Wang, Y. Synthesis and growth mechanism of multilayer TiO2 nanotube arrays. Nanoscale. 2012, 4, 2968-2977. 44. Regonini, D.; Bowen, C. R.; Jaroenworaluck, A.; Stevens, R. A review of growth mechanism, structure and crystallinity of anodized TiO2 nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2013, 74, 377-406. 45. Brammer, K. S.; Oh, S.; Frandsen, C. J.; Jin, S. Biomaterials and biotechnology schemes utilizing TiO2 nanotube arrays. In Biomaterials science and engineering, IntechOpen: London, United Kingdom, 2011. 46. Zamudio Torres, I.; Pérez Bueno, J. J.; Meas Vong, Y. Process of growth TiO2 nanotubes by anodization in an organic media. In Microscopy: advances in scientific research and education, Méndez-Vilas, A., Ed. Formatex: 2014; pp 887-893. 47. Ozkan, S.; Nguyen, N. T.; Mazare, A.; Cerri, I.; Schmuki, P. Controlled spacing of self-organized anodic TiO2 nanotubes. Electrochem Commun. 2016, 69, 76-79. 48. Yoriya, S.; Mor, G. K.; Sharma, S.; Grimes, C. A. Synthesis of ordered arrays of discrete, partially crystalline titania nanotubes by Ti anodization using diethylene glycol electrolytes. J Mater Chem. 2008, 18, 3332-3336. 49. Valota, A.; LeClere, D. J.; Skeldon, P.; Curioni, M.; Hashimoto, T.; Berger, S.; Kunze, J.; Schmuki, P.; Thompson, G. E. Influence of water content on nanotubular anodic titania formed in fluoride/glycerol electrolytes. Electrochim Acta. 2009, 54, 4321-4327. 50. Ferraris, S.; Spriano, S.; Pan, G.; Venturello, A.; Bianchi, C. L.; Chiesa, R.; Faga, M. G.; Maina, G.; Vernè, E. Surface modification of Ti-6Al-4V alloy for biomineralization and specific biological response: Part I, inorganic modification. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011, 22, 533-545. 51. Albu, S. P.; Roy, P.; Virtanen, S.; Schmuki, P. Self-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays: critical effects on morphology and growth. Isr J Chem. 2010, 50, 453-467. 52. Bauer, S.; Kleber, S.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 nanotubes: Tailoring the geometry in H3PO4/HF electrolytes. Electrochem Commun. 2006, 8, 1321-1325. 53. Yin, H.; Liu, H.; Shen, W. Z. The large diameter and fast growth of self-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays achieved via electrochemical anodization. Nanotechnology. 2010, 21, 035601. 54. Bauer, S.; Park, J.; Faltenbacher, J.; Berger, S.; von der Mark, K.; Schmuki, P. Size selective behavior of mesenchymal stem cells on ZrO(2) and TiO(2) nanotube arrays. Integr Biol (Camb). 2009, 1, 525-532. 55. Sánchez-Tovar, R.; Lee, K.; García-Antón, J.; Schmuki, P. Formation of anodic TiO2 nanotube or nanosponge morphology determined by the electrolyte hydrodynamic conditions. Electrochem Commun. 2013, 26, 1-4. 56. Law, K. Y. Definitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and superhydrophobicity: getting the basics right. J Phys Chem Lett. 2014, 5, 686-688. 57. Lamour, G.; Hamraoui, A.; Buvailo, A.; Xing, Y.; Keuleyan, S.; Prakash, V.; Eftekhari-Bafrooei, A.; Borguet, E. Contact angle measurements using a simplified experimental setup. J Chem Educ. 2010, 87, 1403-1407. 58. Liu, G.; Du, K.; Wang, K. Surface wettability of TiO2 nanotube arrays prepared by electrochemical anodization. Appl Surf Sci. 2016, 388, 313-320. 59. Ozcan, M.; Allahbeickaraghi, A.; Dündar, M. Possible hazardous effects of hydrofluoric acid and recommendations for treatment approach: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 2012, 16, 15-23. 60. Everett, E. T. Fluoride’s effects on the formation of teeth and bones, and the influence of genetics. J Dent Res. 2011, 90, 552-560. 61. Zareidoost, A.; Yousefpour, M.; Ghaseme, B.; Amanzadeh, A. The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012, 23, 1479-1488. 62. Metavarayuth, K.; Sitasuwan, P.; Zhao, X.; Lin, Y.; Wang, Q. Influence of surface topographical cues on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016, 2, 142-151. 63. Gstraunthaler, G.; Lindl, T.; van der Valk, J. A plea to reduce or replace fetal bovine serum in cell culture media. Cytotechnology. 2013, 65, 791-793. 64. Heger, J. I.; Froehlich, K.; Pastuschek, J.; Schmidt, A.; Baer, C.; Mrowka, R.; Backsch, C.; Schleußner, E.; Markert, U. R.; Schmidt, A. Human serum alters cell culture behavior and improves spheroid formation in comparison to fetal bovine serum. Exp Cell Res. 2018, 365, 57-65. 65. Fang, C. Y.; Wu, C. C.; Fang, C. L.; Chen, W. Y.; Chen, C. L. Long-term growth comparison studies of FBS and FBS alternatives in six head and neck cell lines. PLoS One. 2017, 12, e0178960. 66. Bratengeier, C. Mechanisms of mechanically induced Osteoclastogenesis: in a novel in vitro model for bone implant loosening. Linköping University: Norrköping. 2019. 67. Li, P. P.; Gu, C.; Liang, B. Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Tan, W. S. A serum-free medium suitable for maintaining cell morphology and liver-specific function in induced human hepatocytes. Cytotechnology. 2019, 71, 329-344. 68. Khalili, A. A.; Ahmad, M. R. A review of cell adhesion studies for biomedical and biological applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2015, 16, 18149-18184. 69. Chen, S.; Guo, Y.; Liu, R.; Wu, S.; Fang, J.; Huang, B.; Li, Z.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Z. Tuning surface properties of bone biomaterials to manipulate osteoblastic cell adhesion and the signaling pathways for the enhancement of early osseointegration. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018, 164, 58-69. 70. Xi, A.; Bothun, G. D. Centrifugation-based assay for examining nanoparticle-lipid membrane binding and disruption. Analyst. 2014, 139, 973-981. 71. Franco-Barraza, J.; Beacham, D. A.; Amatangelo, M. D.; Cukierman, E. Preparation of extracellular matrices produced by cultured and primary fibroblasts. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2016, 71, 10.19.11-10.19.34. 72. Khan, R. S.; Newsome, P. N. A comparison of phenotypic and functional properties of mesenchymal stromal cells and multipotent adult progenitor cells. Front Immunol. 2019, 10, 1952. 73. Hong, S. H.; Lee, M. H.; Koo, M. A.; Seon, G. M.; Park, Y. J.; Kim, D.; Park, J. C. Stem cell passage affects directional migration of stem cells in electrotaxis. Stem Cell Res. 2019, 38, 101475. 74. Zheng, H.; Martin, J. A.; Duwayri, Y.; Falcon, G.; Buckwalter, J. A. Impact of aging on rat bone marrow-derived stem cell chondrogenesis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007, 62, 136-148. 75. Higuchi, A.; Shimmura, S.; Takeuchi, T.; Suematsu, M.; Tsubota, K. Elucidation of apoptosis induced by serum deprivation in cultured conjunctival epithelial cells. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006, 90, 760-764. 76. Alberts, B.; Johnson, A.; Lewis, J.; Raff, M.; Roberts, K.; Walter, P. Molecular biology of the cell. 4th ed. Garland Science: New York, 2002. 77. Schwartz, M. A. Integrins and extracellular matrix in mechanotransduction. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010, 2, a005066. 78. Wozniak, M. A.; Modzelewska, K.; Kwong, L.; Keely, P. J. Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004, 1692, 103-119. 79. Mirbagheri, M.; Adibnia, V.; Hughes, B. R.; Waldman, S. D.; Banquy, X.; Hwang, D. K. Advanced cell culture platforms: a growing quest for emulating natural tissues. Mater Horiz. 2019, 6, 45-71. 80. Arnold, M.; Cavalcanti-Adam, E. A.; Glass, R.; Blümmel, J.; Eck, W.; Kantlehner, M.; Kessler, H.; Spatz, J. P. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chemphyschem. 2004, 5, 383-388. 81. Kim, D. H.; Provenzano, P. P.; Smith, C. L.; Levchenko, A. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J Cell Biol. 2012, 197, 351-360. 82. Reyes, C. D.; Petrie, T. A.; Burns, K. L.; Schwartz, Z.; García, A. J. Biomolecular surface coating to enhance orthopaedic tissue healing and integration. Biomaterials. 2007, 28, 3228-3235. 83. Wojtowicz, A. M.; Shekaran, A.; Oest, M. E.; Dupont, K. M.; Templeman, K. L.; Hutmacher, D. W.; Guldberg, R. E.; García, A. J. Coating of biomaterial scaffolds with the collagen-mimetic peptide GFOGER for bone defect repair. Biomaterials. 2010, 31, 2574-2582. 84. Hanawa, T. Titanium-tissue interface reaction and its control with surface treatment. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 170. 85. Tapscott, D. C.; Wottowa, C. Orthopedic implant materials. In StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL), 2022. 86. Wang, W.; Poh, C. K. Titanium alloys in orthopaedics. In Titanium alloys - advances in properties control, Sieniawski, J.; Ziaja, W., eds.; IntechOpen: London, 2013. 87. Kim, Y. H.; Choi, M.; Kim, J. W. Are titanium implants actually safe for magnetic resonance imaging examinations? Arch Plast Surg. 2019, 46, 96-97. 88. Mendonça, G.; Mendonça, D. B.; Aragão, F. J.; Cooper, L. F. Advancing dental implant surface technology—from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2008, 29, 3822-3835. 89. Pachauri, P.; Bathala, L. R.; Sangur, R. Techniques for dental implant nanosurface modifications. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014, 6, 498-504. 90. Bressan, E.; Sbricoli, L.; Guazzo, R.; Tocco, I.; Roman, M.; Vindigni, V.; Stellini, E.; Gardin, C.; Ferroni, L.; Sivolella, S.; Zavan, B. Nanostructured surfaces of dental implants. Int J Mol Sci. 2013, 14, 1918-1931. 91. Baena, R. R. y.; Rizzo, S.; Manzo, L.; Lupi, S. M.; Andersson, M. Nanofeatured titanium surfaces for dental implantology: biological effects, biocompatibility, and safety. J Nanomaterials. 2017, 2017, 18. 92. Roy, P.; Berger, S.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 nanotubes: synthesis and applications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011, 50, 2904-2939. 93. Lee, W.; Scholz, R.; Gösele, U. A continuous process for structurally well-defined Al2O3 nanotubes based on pulse anodization of aluminum. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 2155-2160. 94. Minagar, S.; Berndt, C. C.; Wang, J.; Ivanova, E.; Wen, C. A review of the application of anodization for the fabrication of nanotubes on metal implant surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 2875-2888. 95. Mohan, L.; Kar, S.; Nandhini, B.; Kumar, S. S. D.; Nagai, M.; Santra, T. S. Formation of nanostructures on magnesium alloy by anodization for potential biomedical applications. Mater Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101403. 96. Rani, R. A.; Zoolfakar, A. S.; Ou, J. Z.; Kadir, R. A.; Nili, H.; Latham, K.; Sriram, S.; Bhaskaran, M.; Zhuiykov, S.; Kaner, R. B.; Kalantar-zadeh, K. Reduced impurity-driven defect states in anodized nanoporous Nb2O5: the possibility of improving performance of photoanodes. Chem Commun (Camb). 2013, 49, 6349-6351. 97. Dobosz, I. Influence of the anodization conditions and chemical treatment on the formation of alumina membranes with defined pore diameters. J Porous Mater. 2021, 28, 1011-1022. 98. Quinn, J.; McFadden, R.; Chan, C. W.; Carson, L. Titanium for orthopedic applications: an overview of surface modification to improve biocompatibility and prevent bacterial biofilm formation. iScience. 2020, 23, 101745. 99. Mansoorianfar, M.; Tavoosi, M.; Mozafarinia, R.; Ghasemi, A.; Doostmohammadi, A. Preparation and characterization of TiO2 nanotube arrays on Ti6Al4V surface for enhancement of cell treatment. Surf Coat Technol. 2017, 321, 409-415. 100. Popat, K. C.; Leoni, L.; Grimes, C. A.; Desai, T. A. Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials. 2007, 28, 3188-3197. 101. Li, Y.; Li, B.; Fu, X.; Li, J.; Li, C.; Li, H.; Li, H.; Liang, C.; Wang, H.; Zhou, L.; Xin, S. Anodic oxidation modification improve bioactivity and biocompatibility of titanium implant surface. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2013, 22, 351-358.