BMTBiomaterials TranslationalTBA2096-112XBiomaterials Translational10.12336/biomatertransl.2023.02.006Research ArticleHarnessing decellularised extracellular matrix microgels into modular bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting with good printability and high post-printing cell viabilityhttps://artdesignp.com/journal/BMT/4/2/10.12336/biomatertransl.2023.02.006ChuHanyu,ZhangKexin,RaoZilong,SongPanpan,LinZudong,ZhouJing,YangLiqun,QuanDaping,BaiYing2023422023-06-28The printability of bioink and post-printing cell viability is crucial for extrusion-based bioprinting. A proper bioink not only provides mechanical support for structural fidelity, but also serves as suitable three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment for cell encapsulation and protection. In this study, a hydrogel-based composite bioink was developed consisting of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) as the continuous phase and decellularised extracellular matrix microgels (DMs) as the discrete phase. A flow-focusing microfluidic system was employed for the fabrication of cell-laden DMs in a high-throughput manner. After gentle mixing of the DMs and GelMA, both rheological characterisations and 3D printing tests showed that the resulting DM-GelMA hydrogel preserved the shear-thinning nature, mechanical properties, and good printability from GelMA. The integration of DMs not only provided an extracellular matrix-like microenvironment for cell encapsulation, but also considerable shear-resistance for high post-printing cell viability. The DM sizes and inner diameters of the 3D printer needles were correlated and optimised for nozzle-based extrusion. Furthermore, a proof-of-concept bioink composedg of RSC96 Schwann cells encapsulated DMs and human umbilical vein endothelial cell-laden GelMA was successfully bioprinted into 3D constructs, resulting in a modular co-culture system with distinct cells/materials distribution. Overall, the modular DM-GelMA bioink provides a springboard for future precision biofabrication and will serve in numerous biomedical applications such as tissue engineering and drug screening.3D bioprinting ; bioinks ; cell viability ; decellularised extracellular matrix ; microgels

1. Daly, A. C.; Prendergast, M. E.; Hughes, A. J.; Burdick, J. A. Bioprinting for the Biologist. *Cell.* 2021, 184, 18-32. 2. Derakhshanfar, S.; Mbeleck, R.; Xu, K.; Zhang, X.; Zhong, W.; Xing, M. 3D Bioprinting for Biomedical Devices and Tissue Engineering: A Review of Recent Trends and Advances. *Bioact Mater.* 2018, 3, 144-156. 3. Gungor-Ozkerim, P. S.; Inci, I.; Zhang, Y. S.; Khademhosseini, A.; Dokmeci, M. R. Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: An Overview. *Biomater Sci.* 2018, 6, 915-946. 4. Unagolla, J. M.; Jayasuriya, A. C. Hydrogel-Based 3D Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review on Cell-Laden Hydrogels, Bioink Formulations, and Future Perspectives. *Appl Mater Today.* 2020, 18, 100479. 5. Ying, G.; Jiang, N.; Yu, C.; Zhang, Y. S. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA). *Bio-des Manuf.* 2018, 1, 215-224. 6. Bandyopadhyay, A.; Mandal, B. B.; Bhardwaj, N. 3D Bioprinting of Photo-Crosslinkable Silk Methacrylate (SilMA)-Polyethylene Glycol Diacrylate (PEGDA) Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. *J Biomed Mater Res A.* 2022, 110, 884-898. 7. Lee, J. M.; Suen, S. K. Q.; Ng, W. L.; Ma, W. C.; Yeong, W. Y. Bioprinting of Collagen: Considerations, Potentials, and Applications. *Macromol Biosci.* 2021, 21, e2000280. 8. Jia, J.; Richards, D. J.; Pollard, S.; Tan, Y.; Rodriguez, J.; Visconti, R. P.; Trusk, T. C.; Yost, M. J.; Yao, H.; Markwald, R. R.; Mei, Y. Engineering Alginate as Bioink for Bioprinting. *Acta Biomater.* 2014, 10, 4323-4331. 9. Gao, Q.; Niu, X.; Shao, L.; Zhou, L.; Lin, Z.; Sun, A.; Fu, J.; Chen, Z.; Hu, J.; Liu, Y.; He, Y. 3D Printing of Complex GelMA-Based Scaffolds with Nanoclay. *Biofabrication.* 2019, 11, 035006. 10. Busch, R.; Strohbach, A.; Pennewitz, M.; Lorenz, F.; Bahls, M.; Busch, M. C.; Felix, S. B. Regulation of the Endothelial Apelin/APJ System by Hemodynamic Fluid Flow. *Cell Signal.* 2015, 27, 1286-1296. 11. Xu, H. Q.; Liu, J. C.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Xu, C. X. A Review on Cell Damage, Viability, and Functionality During 3D Bioprinting. *Mil Med Res.* 2022, 9, 70. 12. Adhikari, J.; Roy, A.; Das, A.; Ghosh, M.; Thomas, S.; Sinha, A.; Kim, J.; Saha, P. Effects of Processing Parameters of 3D Bioprinting on the Cellular Activity of Bioinks. *Macromol Biosci.* 2021, 21, e2000179. 13. Luan, C.; Liu, P.; Chen, R.; Chen, B. Hydrogel-Based 3D Carriers in the Application of Stem Cell Therapy by Direct Injection. *Nanotechnol Rev.* 2017, 6, 435-448. 14. Highley, C. B.; Song, K. H.; Daly, A. C.; Burdick, J. A. Jammed Microgel Inks for 3D Printing Applications. *Adv Sci (Weinh).* 2019, 6, 1801076. 15. Daly, A. C.; Riley, L.; Segura, T.; Burdick, J. A. Hydrogel Microparticles for Biomedical Applications. *Nat Rev Mater.* 2020, 5, 20-43. 16. Fang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Ji, M.; Li, B.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, T.; Xiong, Z. 3D Printing of Cell-Laden Microgel-Based Biphasic Bioink with Heterogeneous Microenvironment for Biomedical Applications. *Adv Funct Mater.* 2022, 32, 2109810. 17. Chen, J.; Huang, D.; Wang, L.; Hou, J.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Zhong, S.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Huang, W. 3D Bioprinted Multiscale Composite Scaffolds Based on Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA)/Chitosan Microspheres as a Modular Bioink for Enhancing 3D Neurite Outgrowth and Elongation. *J Colloid Interface Sci.* 2020, 574, 162-173. 18. Xin, S.; Deo, K. A.; Dai, J.; Pandian, N. K. R.; Chimene, D.; Moebius, R. M.; Jain, A.; Han, A.; Gaharwar, A. K.; Alge, D. L. Generalizing Hydrogel Microparticles into a New Class of Bioinks for Extrusion Bioprinting. *Sci Adv.* 2021, 7, eabk3087. 19. Feng, Q.; Li, D.; Li, Q.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, S.; Lin, Z.; Cao, X.; Dong, H. Assembling Microgels via Dynamic Cross-Linking Reaction Improves Printability, Microporosity, Tissue-Adhesion, and Self-Healing of Microgel Bioink for Extrusion Bioprinting. *ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.* 2022, 14, 15653-15666. 20. Zhao, X.; Liu, S.; Yildirimer, L.; Zhao, H.; Ding, R.; Wang, H.; Cui, W.; Weitz, D. Injectable Stem Cell-Laden Photocrosslinkable Microspheres Fabricated Using Microfluidics for Rapid Generation of Osteogenic Tissue Constructs. *Adv Funct Mater.* 2016, 26, 2809-2819. 21. An, C.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Pang, B.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Liao, H.; Ren, C.; Wang, H. Continuous Microfluidic Encapsulation of Single Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using Alginate Microgels as Injectable Fillers for Bone Regeneration. *Acta Biomater.* 2020, 111, 181-196. 22. Riederer, M. S.; Requist, B. D.; Payne, K. A.; Way, J. D.; Krebs, M. D. Injectable and Microporous Scaffold of Densely-Packed, Growth Factor-Encapsulating Chitosan Microgels. *Carbohydr Polym.* 2016, 152, 792-801. 23. Xu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, S.; Gao, F.; Guo, W.; Sun, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, H.; Rao, Z.; Qiu, S.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, X.; Guo, X.; Shao, Z.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, X.; Quan, D. Understanding the Role of Tissue-Specific Decellularized Spinal Cord Matrix Hydrogel for Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Microenvironment Reconstruction and Spinal Cord Injury. *Biomaterials.* 2021, 268, 120596. 24. Kim, B. S.; Das, S.; Jang, J.; Cho, D. W. Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for Engineering Tissue- and Organ-Specific Microenvironments. *Chem Rev.* 2020, 120, 10608-10661. 25. Lin, Z.; Rao, Z.; Chen, J.; Chu, H.; Zhou, J.; Yang, L.; Quan, D.; Bai, Y. Bioactive Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel Microspheres Fabricated Using a Temperature-Controlling Microfluidic System. *ACS Biomater Sci Eng.* 2022, 8, 1644-1655. 26. Abaci, A.; Guvendiren, M. Designing Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. *Adv Healthc Mater.* 2020, 9, e2000734. 27. Wang, T.; Han, Y.; Wu, Z.; Qiu, S.; Rao, Z.; Zhao, C.; Zhu, Q.; Quan, D.; Bai, Y.; Liu, X. Tissue-Specific Hydrogels for Three-Dimensional Printing and Potential Application in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. *Tissue Eng Part A.* 2022, 28, 161-174. 28. Kim, M. K.; Jeong, W.; Lee, S. M.; Kim, J. B.; Jin, S.; Kang, H. Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bio-Ink with Enhanced 3D Printability and Mechanical Properties. *Biofabrication.* 2020, 12, 025003. 29. Li, X.; Chen, S.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Kawazoe, N.; Chen, G. 3D Culture of Chondrocytes in Gelatin Hydrogels with Different Stiffness. *Polymers (Basel).* 2016, 8, 269. 30. Fairbanks, B. D.; Schwartz, M. P.; Bowman, C. N.; Anseth, K. S. Photoinitiated Polymerization of PEG-Diacrylate with Lithium Phenyl-2,4,6-Trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: Polymerization Rate and Cytocompatibility. *Biomaterials.* 2009, 30, 6702-6707. 31. Schneider, C. A.; Rasband, W. S.; Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. *Nat Methods.* 2012, 9, 671-675. 32. Ouyang, L.; Yao, R.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, W. Effect of Bioink Properties on Printability and Cell Viability for 3D Bioplotting of Embryonic Stem Cells. *Biofabrication.* 2016, 8, 035020. 33. Gal, I.; Edri, R.; Noor, N.; Rotenberg, M.; Namestnikov, M.; Cabilly, I.; Shapira, A.; Dvir, T. Injectable Cardiac Cell Microdroplets for Tissue Regeneration. *Small.* 2020, 16, e1904806. 34. Akartuna, I.; Aubrecht, D. M.; Kodger, T. E.; Weitz, D. A. Chemically Induced Coalescence in Droplet-Based Microfluidics. *Lab Chip.* 2015, 15, 1140-1144. 35. Zheng, Y.; Wu, Z.; Khan, M.; Mao, S.; Manibalan, K.; Li, N.; Lin, J. M.; Lin, L. Multifunctional Regulation of 3D Cell-Laden Microsphere Culture on an Integrated Microfluidic Device. *Anal Chem.* 2019, 91, 12283-12289. 36. Xu, J.; Fang, H.; Zheng, S.; Li, L.; Jiao, Z.; Wang, H.; Nie, Y.; Liu, T.; Song, K. A Biological Functional Hybrid Scaffold Based on Decellularized Extracellular Matrix/Gelatin/Chitosan with High Biocompatibility and Antibacterial Activity for Skin Tissue Engineering. *Int J Biol Macromol.* 2021, 187, 840-849. 37. Ning, L.; Yang, B.; Mohabatpour, F.; Betancourt, N.; Sarker, M. D.; Papagerakis, P.; Chen, X. Process-Induced Cell Damage: Pneumatic Versus Screw-Driven Bioprinting. *Biofabrication.* 2020, 12, 025011. 38. Rao, Z.; Lin, Z.; Song, P.; Quan, D.; Bai, Y. Biomaterial-Based Schwann Cell Transplantation and Schwann Cell-Derived Biomaterials for Nerve Regeneration. *Front Cell Neurosci.* 2022, 16, 926222. 39. Ogunshola, O. O.; Antic, A.; Donoghue, M. J.; Fan, S. Y.; Kim, H.; Stewart, W. B.; Madri, J. A.; Ment, L. R. Paracrine and Autocrine Functions of Neuronal Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in the Central Nervous System. *J Biol Chem.* 2002, 277, 11410-11415. 40. Zou, J. L.; Liu, S.; Sun, J. H.; Yang, W. H.; Xu, Y. W.; Rao, Z. L.; Jiang, B.; Zhu, Q. T.; Liu, X. L.; Wu, J. L.; Chang, C.; Mao, H. Q.; Ling, E. A.; Quan, D. P.; Zeng, Y. S. Peripheral Nerve-Derived Matrix Hydrogel Promotes Remyelination and Inhibits Synapse Formation. *Adv Funct Mater.* 2018, 28, 1705739. 41. Chen, S.; Du, Z.; Zou, J.; Qiu, S.; Rao, Z.; Liu, S.; Sun, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, X.; Mao, H. Q.; Bai, Y.; Quan, D. Promoting Neurite Growth and Schwann Cell Migration by the Harnessing Decellularized Nerve Matrix onto Nanofibrous Guidance. *ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.* 2019, 11, 17167-17176.